<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CHRS Passes Resolution Supporting Streetcars Without Overhead Wires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>I have been a resident of Woodley Park for over 10 years and a Washingtonian for even longer.  Few proposals in the District have made me as excited as this one has.  For the first time, I see a mindset geared towards progress and expansion.  Washington, DC is a wonderful city with vast potential to be a world class metropolitan area.  The hysteria that has been created from overhead wires is simply unfounded in my opinion.  Having lived in Germany for most of my life, overhead wires seem a natural occurrence in a city.  Frankly, I would find an overhead wire fare less unattractive than a vacant building.  There are a series of legal and, more importantly, engineering debates that need to take place in regards to power supplies for the street cars; however, stalling the entire process (which will take a while to complete without these potholes) due to an overhead power source is the same attitude that has hindered DC for years.  With a population on the rise and an eye towards the future it is time that groups such as CHRS are marginalized and relegated to their appropriate roles.  While they should always have a voice for their organizations it should not be able to derail projects.  Far too often in this city does a small, unrepresentative group masquerade as the opinions of the majority.  I have great hope for this coming decade in Washington and hope that others will join in voicing an opinion for real, demonstrated progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a resident of Woodley Park for over 10 years and a Washingtonian for even longer.  Few proposals in the District have made me as excited as this one has.  For the first time, I see a mindset geared towards progress and expansion.  Washington, DC is a wonderful city with vast potential to be a world class metropolitan area.  The hysteria that has been created from overhead wires is simply unfounded in my opinion.  Having lived in Germany for most of my life, overhead wires seem a natural occurrence in a city.  Frankly, I would find an overhead wire fare less unattractive than a vacant building.  There are a series of legal and, more importantly, engineering debates that need to take place in regards to power supplies for the street cars; however, stalling the entire process (which will take a while to complete without these potholes) due to an overhead power source is the same attitude that has hindered DC for years.  With a population on the rise and an eye towards the future it is time that groups such as CHRS are marginalized and relegated to their appropriate roles.  While they should always have a voice for their organizations it should not be able to derail projects.  Far too often in this city does a small, unrepresentative group masquerade as the opinions of the majority.  I have great hope for this coming decade in Washington and hope that others will join in voicing an opinion for real, demonstrated progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Paul, in-ground powering systems such as Bordeaux&#039;s only make sense when there is a major existing fleet of overhead powered streetcars that can, at moderate cost, be modified to access external power in a less obtrusive way...from below or at some passenger stops.

But where no such fleet exists (the typical USA situation) the high capital cost, interference with buried utility plant, ongoing maintenance, and general antiquity of the whole external power concept favor on-board power over any external supply option.

This will probably wind up as hybridization of batteries charged off the grid at night and augmented during service hours by small, clean-tuned constant-speed diesels;  by compressed natural gas gensets;  or via hydrogen...either efficient fuel cells or less expensive but less efficient H2 internal combustion engines.

Risk of interference with buried utility infrastructure is a strong negative for any external power alternative. 

The potential for subsequent retrofit with better batteries and cleaner future generations of prime movers favors onboard power alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, in-ground powering systems such as Bordeaux&#8217;s only make sense when there is a major existing fleet of overhead powered streetcars that can, at moderate cost, be modified to access external power in a less obtrusive way&#8230;from below or at some passenger stops.</p>
<p>But where no such fleet exists (the typical USA situation) the high capital cost, interference with buried utility plant, ongoing maintenance, and general antiquity of the whole external power concept favor on-board power over any external supply option.</p>
<p>This will probably wind up as hybridization of batteries charged off the grid at night and augmented during service hours by small, clean-tuned constant-speed diesels;  by compressed natural gas gensets;  or via hydrogen&#8230;either efficient fuel cells or less expensive but less efficient H2 internal combustion engines.</p>
<p>Risk of interference with buried utility infrastructure is a strong negative for any external power alternative. </p>
<p>The potential for subsequent retrofit with better batteries and cleaner future generations of prime movers favors onboard power alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyra</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Hill Resident:

All I&#039;m saying is that things can change. Don&#039;t underestimate what could be. It may take a while and it may never live up to its potential, but it could be a great street one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hill Resident:</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that things can change. Don&#8217;t underestimate what could be. It may take a while and it may never live up to its potential, but it could be a great street one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trulee pist</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>trulee pist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Regarding H Street NE, the first leg of the streetcar system on Capitol Hill:

A couple of fictional characters from Edward P. Jones&#039;s short story collection, &quot;All Aunt Hagar&#039;s Children,&quot;  talk about what makes H Street NE special.

In &quot;Adam Robinson Acquires Grandparents and a Little Sister,&quot;
&quot;Where were all the oaks and maples and birches, even the odd pear, apple or peach tree, that had been there in the time when he did not yet know himself and the city seemed always as green as his granparents&#039; idea of Heaven?...  The cab approached H Street, N.E.  He could see box after box meant for trees existed now only to support litter.  Between the parked cars, Noah could see that the city government people had thrown up the occasional young tree, like the one in front of his apartment building....They would not live out the year. &#039;Root, little pig, or die,&#039; his father and grandfather liked to say....Noah forgave that street for being virtually treeless, for that had always been its way.&quot;

And in &quot;Root Worker,&quot;
&quot;All that week of being ten her father had promised her a Saturday of shopping and a movie at the Atlas theater and a half smoke from Mile Long as they went up and down the busy commercial H Street....She might have been able to look down toward H and see all the excitement of a Saturday on H Street.  The happy children.  The Atlas announcing in big letters on its marquee what extraordinary movie awaited a child...and candy without end might rot a girl&#039;s teeth on any other day of the week, but not on a special Saturday.&quot;

I hope that helps people as they think about the H Street streetcar and overhead wires.

For all Hill folks, I hope you read Edward P. Jones&#039;s two collections of short stories!  Great literature, set right outside your front door!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding H Street NE, the first leg of the streetcar system on Capitol Hill:</p>
<p>A couple of fictional characters from Edward P. Jones&#8217;s short story collection, &#8220;All Aunt Hagar&#8217;s Children,&#8221;  talk about what makes H Street NE special.</p>
<p>In &#8220;Adam Robinson Acquires Grandparents and a Little Sister,&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Where were all the oaks and maples and birches, even the odd pear, apple or peach tree, that had been there in the time when he did not yet know himself and the city seemed always as green as his granparents&#8217; idea of Heaven?&#8230;  The cab approached H Street, N.E.  He could see box after box meant for trees existed now only to support litter.  Between the parked cars, Noah could see that the city government people had thrown up the occasional young tree, like the one in front of his apartment building&#8230;.They would not live out the year. &#8216;Root, little pig, or die,&#8217; his father and grandfather liked to say&#8230;.Noah forgave that street for being virtually treeless, for that had always been its way.&#8221;</p>
<p>And in &#8220;Root Worker,&#8221;<br />
&#8220;All that week of being ten her father had promised her a Saturday of shopping and a movie at the Atlas theater and a half smoke from Mile Long as they went up and down the busy commercial H Street&#8230;.She might have been able to look down toward H and see all the excitement of a Saturday on H Street.  The happy children.  The Atlas announcing in big letters on its marquee what extraordinary movie awaited a child&#8230;and candy without end might rot a girl&#8217;s teeth on any other day of the week, but not on a special Saturday.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope that helps people as they think about the H Street streetcar and overhead wires.</p>
<p>For all Hill folks, I hope you read Edward P. Jones&#8217;s two collections of short stories!  Great literature, set right outside your front door!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trulee pist</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>trulee pist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Mostly, my opinion is &quot;faster, please.&quot;  I really like the streetcars plan.

I think the &quot;all wireless&quot; option will never get out of the station.  Constructive commentary on where to go wireless and where to accept wires is the next logical point of discussion on propulsion.  

CHRS has drawn its line on the map: &quot;the area south of Florida Avenue/Benning Road, west of the Anacostia River,&quot; they write in their resolution, is the L&#039;Enfant Plan area that is protected by the National Capital Planning Commission and on the National Register of Historic Places, AND there are other &quot;areas outside the L’Enfant Plan that deserve protection from unsightly overhead wires used to power streetcars.&quot;  

That seems a little too broad for me.  It depends on what the engineers say will work reliably and at a reasonable cost, but I&#039;d be satisfied with protecting vistas along state-named streets and intersections with those streets, then take on a case-by-case basis the arguments for other stretches that should go wireless if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly, my opinion is &#8220;faster, please.&#8221;  I really like the streetcars plan.</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;all wireless&#8221; option will never get out of the station.  Constructive commentary on where to go wireless and where to accept wires is the next logical point of discussion on propulsion.  </p>
<p>CHRS has drawn its line on the map: &#8220;the area south of Florida Avenue/Benning Road, west of the Anacostia River,&#8221; they write in their resolution, is the L&#8217;Enfant Plan area that is protected by the National Capital Planning Commission and on the National Register of Historic Places, AND there are other &#8220;areas outside the L’Enfant Plan that deserve protection from unsightly overhead wires used to power streetcars.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That seems a little too broad for me.  It depends on what the engineers say will work reliably and at a reasonable cost, but I&#8217;d be satisfied with protecting vistas along state-named streets and intersections with those streets, then take on a case-by-case basis the arguments for other stretches that should go wireless if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the original purpose of the overhead wire ban to make sure views of the Capitol,etc, weren&#039;t blocked? Not a problem on H St.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the original purpose of the overhead wire ban to make sure views of the Capitol,etc, weren&#8217;t blocked? Not a problem on H St.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-937</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many CHRS members actually catch the bus or bike along H street, or even leave town for that matter. San Francisco, Portland, Or and Seattle have overhead wires for their streetcars. It looks fine, and it works. 
Those of us that do use the B2 need more public transportation options, and at a reasonable price. I just heard that the free shuttle will end on Sunday. Where was CHRS to advocate for this wireless option?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many CHRS members actually catch the bus or bike along H street, or even leave town for that matter. San Francisco, Portland, Or and Seattle have overhead wires for their streetcars. It looks fine, and it works.<br />
Those of us that do use the B2 need more public transportation options, and at a reasonable price. I just heard that the free shuttle will end on Sunday. Where was CHRS to advocate for this wireless option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H street resident</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>H street resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-935</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the previous posters, with a special hat tip IMGoph. That was the first thing I noticed.

I grew up in Portland, Oregon, where we have street cars, overhead wires, monumental views (ever seen Mt. Hood), and lotsa trees. I can tell you that the wires are NOT an issue. This hysteria here about the wires, especially to the point where it hampers actually getting the streetcars running, is mystifying. 

I think that CHRS, which does very little in terms of advocacy on the future of H Street, is pretty out-of-line to be weighing in on the side of *slowing* positive developments on that street. 90% of the people on that board and those screaming about protecting the views, which are all up on H street don&#039;t come up there anyway. 

Essentially, people have to be a little flexible in the pursuit of the greater good. Mass hysteria about overhead wires and misleading statements about the feasibility/cost/preferability of underground systems is just more of the same tired baloney from people who forget that it takes adjusting to some change for big change to happen. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m all for protecting the unique features of the Hill, but when it comes at the price not doing things that move the Hill and particularly H Street forward, count me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the previous posters, with a special hat tip IMGoph. That was the first thing I noticed.</p>
<p>I grew up in Portland, Oregon, where we have street cars, overhead wires, monumental views (ever seen Mt. Hood), and lotsa trees. I can tell you that the wires are NOT an issue. This hysteria here about the wires, especially to the point where it hampers actually getting the streetcars running, is mystifying. </p>
<p>I think that CHRS, which does very little in terms of advocacy on the future of H Street, is pretty out-of-line to be weighing in on the side of *slowing* positive developments on that street. 90% of the people on that board and those screaming about protecting the views, which are all up on H street don&#8217;t come up there anyway. </p>
<p>Essentially, people have to be a little flexible in the pursuit of the greater good. Mass hysteria about overhead wires and misleading statements about the feasibility/cost/preferability of underground systems is just more of the same tired baloney from people who forget that it takes adjusting to some change for big change to happen. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m all for protecting the unique features of the Hill, but when it comes at the price not doing things that move the Hill and particularly H Street forward, count me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hill Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Hill Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-934</guid>
		<description>&quot;As a resident who lives near H Street, I wonder how one could say that any street is better or any worse than the other. Sure H Street isn’t the most beautiful street in the District [right now], but I do recall a time when 8th Street wasn’t so pretty either.&quot;

I live near H Street as well.  It&#039;s an easy distinction to make.

H Street = No trees, mostly commercial including large retailers, strip malls, major transit way into and out of the city w/ exclusively stoplights

8th Street = Tree-lined, historic rowhouses (residential) with a few small, mostly local businesses, smaller street with many stop signs and only traffic signals at major intersections

There&#039;s no comparison.  IMO, a much closer comparison would be any of the &quot;state streets&quot; running through the hill and H-street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As a resident who lives near H Street, I wonder how one could say that any street is better or any worse than the other. Sure H Street isn’t the most beautiful street in the District [right now], but I do recall a time when 8th Street wasn’t so pretty either.&#8221;</p>
<p>I live near H Street as well.  It&#8217;s an easy distinction to make.</p>
<p>H Street = No trees, mostly commercial including large retailers, strip malls, major transit way into and out of the city w/ exclusively stoplights</p>
<p>8th Street = Tree-lined, historic rowhouses (residential) with a few small, mostly local businesses, smaller street with many stop signs and only traffic signals at major intersections</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no comparison.  IMO, a much closer comparison would be any of the &#8220;state streets&#8221; running through the hill and H-street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.thehillishome.com/2009/12/chrs-passes-resolution-supporting-streetcars-without-overhead-wires/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehillishome.com/?p=4242#comment-933</guid>
		<description>The CHRS is being idiotic and short sighted. If you are for &quot;restoring&quot; the Hill then street cars should be a part of this.  Streetcars in the past in DC had overhead wires and in other cities in Europe the wires do nothing to detract from the surroundings. This shortsighted nimbyism that is not inline with any effort to &quot;restore&quot; the Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CHRS is being idiotic and short sighted. If you are for &#8220;restoring&#8221; the Hill then street cars should be a part of this.  Streetcars in the past in DC had overhead wires and in other cities in Europe the wires do nothing to detract from the surroundings. This shortsighted nimbyism that is not inline with any effort to &#8220;restore&#8221; the Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

